• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer

So Write Editing

Comprehensive editing for novelists

  • Home
  • About
  • Services + Pricing
  • Resources for Writers
  • FAQ
  • Contact
Home » May’s Spell-Checker Contest post: Errors revealed for review

May’s Spell-Checker Contest post: Errors revealed for review

Feeling Frustrated
Feeling frustrated by spell-checker’s missed errors

Our May Editing Contest was a comedy of errors..

I challenged contestants to wade through a real post riddled with dozens of intentional mistakes. Mistakes composed entirely of words spelled correctly, but used incorrectly.

These are the errors an ordinary spell-checking program cannot reliably identify. They fool your own eye, too, since you know your intended meaning and thus tend to skim past them.

We had a slew of entries, and no true consensus on the correct count; although there was a circling ’round the drain in the vicinity of “about 70” mistakes in total.

I promised more than a simple answer: that I would offer the original post with every error spotlighted. In the reprinted post, shown below, each spelled-right-but-used-incorrectly word is now red-inked.

For a small bonus, I asked players how many complete sentences showed no such errors. These I’ve underlined and colored green.

Now it’s nearly time to distribute May’s prizes–

  •  First Prize, closest error-count — $20
  •  Entry Prize, chosen at random among ALL entries — $10
  • Bonus Prize, for the correct-sentences count — $5

But before I do, let’s have a few keen eyes check my work. Will you read the red- and green-lined post and see if I’ve caught all of the mistakes? Call-out any further corrections you discover by adding a Comment, just below the contest post.

So, for your review, here’s how the May Spell-Checker Error Contest unfolded:

The May Spell-Checker Error Contest begins…

NOW:

Post:  Should You Relay on Spell-Checker to Edit Your Book?

by Jim Bessey

If your like me, you depend upon your word-processing software’s spell-checker to pinpoint errors when your composing.

Let’s be honest hear: even if you did once know how too spell thousands of words, your digital editing buddy has taken over the heavy lifting. Unless you’ve turned yours off (and why wood you??).

When you’re racing your fingers across the keyboard, ideas spouting fourth like lava, Spell-check is an amazing time-savor and a God-send.

So, why do so mane experts like Guy Kawasaki insist that you must pay a competent editor to go though your manuscript before you publish it?

Good question!

Doesn’t good software make expensive editors obsolete? You mite think sow.

However, judging by the shear number of errors I’m seeing in ebooks I’ve bought from Amazon, we’d all be better of to air on the side of caution and pay-up!

On of the funniest mistakes I’ve seen this past ear was from an Author who described the device that’s glued to the inside of you’re windshield as a “review mirror.” Seriously?

“But I can’t afford it!” you scream.

But can you afford knot to hire an editor? Think about this for a minute. In are cent post, author Peg Brantley (Red Tide, The Missings) quoted sum stunning statistics:

Somewhere in the neighborhood of 1,000,000 books are published each year in the U.S. alone. That’s more than 83,000 a month. 2,700 a day. 114 books a minute. Every minute.

Now, were would you rather be among those million new books this year? Top 10% or bottom 10%? Here’s how two guarantee the ladder: publish a book filled with mistakes like the ones in this post.

If you want to cell books, lost of them, yours will need to bee nearly error-free.

“I can due it myself,” you insist.

Can you really? Can you, your husband, ore your best righting buddy catch at least 99% of the mistakes in your manuscript?

History and personal experience says, “not likely.”

The trouble centers around an lack of objectivity. You now what you rote. Your spouse loves you, and your friend doesn’t want to hurt you feelings. Their not editors, so you can’t deepened on then to be through and professional.

Sew what’s a writer to do?

You could settle four less. I’m not trying to rein on your parade here. I’m trying to be honest, the weigh a paid editor would level with you.

Event if your story is fantastic, but its filled with mistakes — only your friends will bye it.

If you have optimistic goals about sails of your book and want to keep those objectives in site, you well have to publish the beast possible product that you can produce. Don’t district readers with errors. They’ll never comeback.

And they won’t even bother to leaf you reviews. Or even review mirrors. (Don’t count that!)

Trust me, the future success off your book depends on word of month and grate reviews.

Otherwise, you simply don’t half enough friends.

Wear do you want your book to be in they ear 2014? If you’d like to sea it hit one of Amazon’s best-seller lists, then byte the bullet and heir a professional editor.

Please don’t weight for pour reviews and dismal sales figures to proof my point for you.

Invest in yore future and inspect success fore your book. And stop looking for any more errors now!

»Photo credit:  Zach Klein


questionDid you find “spell-checker” errors that I missed? Describe your additional finds in Comments, just below.

Note: For this contest, we did not include any inadvertent punctuation or grammatical errors unrelated to the whole spell-checker issue here. Thanks!

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Robin Tidwell says

    June 9, 2013 at 9:57 am

    God-send = godsend
    Spell-check = spell-check
    pay-up = pay up
    “History and personal experience says, “not likely.” = say

    Sorry, couldn’t resist!

    Reply
    • Eva P. Scott says

      June 9, 2013 at 7:53 pm

      If “Spell-check” is used in the place of the formal name of a program, it would be capitalized versus using it to speak about all spell checkers. [I looked up spell checkers, and one of the first programs was named SPELL, an acronym.]

      Reply
      • Jim Bessey says

        June 9, 2013 at 9:14 pm

        Thanks, Eva.

        Can you point to the specific sentence where I’ve used that improperly? (See my earlier reply to Robin Tidwell.)

        We’re almost there, thanks!

        Reply
        • Eva P. Scott says

          June 16, 2013 at 11:06 pm

          –When you’re racing your fingers across the keyboard, ideas spouting fourth like lava, Spell-check is an amazing time-savor and a God-send.

          [I was actually replying to someone saying that “Spell-check” would be capitalized in the sentence you wrote and would not be an error.]

          Reply
          • Jim Bessey says

            June 17, 2013 at 8:32 pm

            I ended up on the fence about this one, too, Eva.

            If “Spell-check” is the brand name for an application, then the capitalization is correct. However, if instead it’s just a generic identity for all spell-checking software, then it should be lowercase. This just goes to show that I should have had a professional editor proofread my error-filled post so I could be certain which were mistakes and which weren’t.

            In any event, I put all four players who entered counts of 72 and 73 into the pool for the First Place prize. That was the best solution I could think of as a remedy.

      • Jim Bessey says

        June 9, 2013 at 9:38 pm

        OK, I found it while adding in the other errors, thanks!

        Reply
    • Jim Bessey says

      June 9, 2013 at 9:12 pm

      Looks like you’ve caught all of the remaining possibilities, Robin.

      Both “God-send” and “pay-up” are my fault. This points out that most spell-check software will simply ignore hyphenated words. Although I did not include those errors intentionally, we will have to count them.

      However, I haven’t been able to locate the “Spell-check” instance. I’ve found it only at the beginning of a sentence, in which case the capitalization is forced.

      Sorry about that verb “says”. It sounds right to my ear, but upon review it is indeed incorrect. I think we have to count it, then. Which also disallows that sentence as error-free.

      I’ll edit the displayed post to reflect your points.

      Reply
    • Jim Bessey says

      June 9, 2013 at 9:39 pm

      I’ve now made those changes, Robin. “New” errors are red and underlined.

      We might be ready for a final count.

      Reply
  2. raymond alexander kukkee says

    June 9, 2013 at 10:00 am

    I still get 70…haha! Grate contesst. “:))

    Reply
  3. glorylennon says

    June 9, 2013 at 11:25 am

    Seems about right to me. This was fun.

    Reply
  4. Melanie Kissell says

    June 9, 2013 at 3:52 pm

    Looks good, Jim. 🙂

    Reply
  5. Charlotte Howard says

    June 11, 2013 at 8:26 am

    So had I included the dodgy hyphens, I may have got 70!

    Reply
  6. Jim Bessey says

    June 16, 2013 at 6:10 pm

    Well folks, I’ve counted three times and have come up with a total of 74 errors each time. In part, this leads to a problem because NO ONE offered a count of 74 as their entry–though we had plenty of very close entries.

    Of those 74, four were not ones I’d intended to include. See Robin Tidwell’s early comment, above.

    Here’s what I’m going to do:
    > We have two entries each of 73 and 72. I’ll choose our Winner from among those four.
    > We also have four entries of 71 or 70. I’ll award an additional $10 “second place” to one of those players.
    > As noted, one contestant will also receive the “thank you for entering” prize of $10, chosen among all non-winners (after I first award the above two prizes).
    > On the In-Comments $5 bonus for “correct sentences,” I show a final total of 6 complete sentences (not fragments) that remain error-free. PJ Yusten and Ann Marie Thomas both ventured “7” as their counts, so one will win that prize on a coin-toss.

    I’ll announce those winners momentarily. Thanks everyone!

    Reply
  7. Jim Bessey says

    June 16, 2013 at 6:59 pm

    Okay, here we go, friends.

    1. Our contest Winner is Jewel Kennington ($20)

    2. Our runner-up prize goes to Rhonda Kronyk ($10)

    3. The Thank You prize is randomly awarded to Leila Wilson ($10)

    4. The Sentence Bonus, won by a coin toss, goes to Ann Marie Thomas ($5)

    Congratulations to all of our winners. Thank you to everyone who entered, a record crowd by the way!

    I’ll contact each winner to confirm your PayPal email choice.

    Reply
  8. glorylennon says

    June 16, 2013 at 8:51 pm

    Congrats to the winners! Poor Jim must still have a headache from this contest! 🙂

    Reply
    • Jim Bessey says

      June 16, 2013 at 8:58 pm

      I’m just really happy to wrap this one up, Glory.

      Our contestants have been very patient while I worked this out. I didn’t want to make any ERRORS in finalizing this, whether in counting, in a subsequent post, or in an email inquiry. That would have been embarrassing.

      This “little” contest attracted a lot of interest, so it was important to me to get it right. I hope I’ve succeeded!

      Reply
      • Brenda Vasquez says

        June 17, 2013 at 10:15 am

        Great job, Jim! I enjoyed participating in this contest. Congrats to the winners!

        Reply
        • Jim Bessey says

          June 17, 2013 at 8:28 pm

          Thanks, Brenda!

          Now I have to come up with something at least as cool for June. Any ideas?

          Reply
  9. Rebekah Jones says

    June 16, 2013 at 8:57 pm

    congrats to all the winners!

    Reply
  10. Spellcheck says

    June 28, 2013 at 10:17 pm

    The online spell check is the better on the internet tool primarily based via reading user reviews and also comments. Some of them also have contributed the Spellcheck between the friends given that they also believe in the effectiveness of while using checker.
    If you interested this comment please share your friend. Thanks for read this comment.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

What my authors are saying

Working with you was a great experience! Knowledgeable, thorough, available - everything I've been looking for in an editor. Thank you! ~Melinda Clayton, Publisher: Thomas-Jacob Publishing. Author of "Child of Sorrow" released Fall 2020

Join our Facebook Group!

Connect with me online

  • Email
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Writing Contests

September 3 Sentences

End of Summer Contest: 3 Consecutive Sentences

Should You Rely on Spell-Checker to Edit Your Book?

May’s Spell-Checker Contest post: Errors revealed for review

May Cash Contest: How many Spell-check errors can you spot?

Dawn Hawkins wins our “Best Opening Paragraph” contest!

March Contest announcement: “Best Opening Paragraph”

March Merch Contest

Congrats to our January Jumpstart contest winner: Mac Pike

January Jumpstart

Footer

Follow me online

  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

About Jim Bessey

Resources for Writers

Services + Pricing

Our Privacy Policy

Copyright © 2022 · So Write Editing · News Pro on Genesis Framework

Our use of cookies
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
Opt Out.
Cookie settingsACCEPT
Manage consent

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
CookieDurationDescription
cookielawinfo-checbox-analytics11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checbox-functional11 monthsThe cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checbox-others11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance11 monthsThis cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy11 monthsThe cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytics
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
Others
Other uncategorized cookies are those that are being analyzed and have not been classified into a category as yet.
SAVE & ACCEPT